Sought after Madhuri

Actress Madhuri Dixit is residing in Denver and taking it easy.Despite receiving offers she is no in mood to sign on the dotted line.

She has not still made up her mind for signing Krishna Shah’s which is based on the late Prime Minister of India Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Also there is news that she might play the lead role in a Broadway show produced by renowned Bollywood choreographer Saroj Khan. The show is based on historical dancer Amrapali.But it seems like her only consideration is care of her sons.

According to Madhuri’s Mumbai manager Rakesh (Rikku) Nag, the actress is receiving several offers but she will take the right decisions at the right time. Also he added that she receives at least two major offers every month but since Madhuri does not give him a go ahead sign, therefore he turns them down.

Madhuri still in dilemma

Actress Madhuri Dixit has not still make up her mind for signing the film of Krishna Shah which is based on the late Prime Minister of India Mrs. Indira Gandhi. She is still weighing the pros and cons associated with the project.

Actress has read the script and is impressed by it and liked it too. For her Indira Gandhi is idol and she would love to portray her in the film. The film is a major Hollywood-Bollywood alliance. Probably Dharmendra and Abhay Deol will play roles of Motilal Nehru and Rajiv Gandhi.

Awaited is her response that whether she will sign on the dotted line or not.

Madhuri’s care of sons

How can the actress Madhuri Dixit be wooed to work for any project? The simple answer lies in taking care of her sons. This has been proved in the past and in the present scenario same has been proved.

When Madhuri did a comeback in bollywood with her film ‘Aaja Nachley‘ it was because of the efforts of Yash Chopra. At the sets producer Yash Chopra had made arrangements for Madhuri’s two little sons by providing them with a playing area. And now it looks that the actress expects the same from all others.

She could not make it to DPL only because the producers could not search for a nanny for her kids. Now also to be part of Krishna Shah’s biopic on Late Prime Minister of India she is considering the location because she does not want to part away from her sons.

We wonder how long the actress will continue like this?

Madhuri’s considerations

Image via Wikipedia

Sometime back the news was that actress Madhuri Dixit has been approached for role of Indira Gandhi in Krishna Shah’s biopic on Late Prime Minister of India. But the actress was quick to react on the news as she clarified she has not yet given nod for the role as there are few considerations to be taken up before the final decision is taken.

Her very first matter of consideration is the cast of the film. According to the sources, Hollywood actors Tom Hanks and Tommy Lee Jones have been approached by the director. Also he wants to include British actors of the likes of Helen Mirren and Albert Finney for this film.

Her other consideration is the location where the shooting will take place. She does not want to part away from her sons.

Very soon we will come to know the final decision of Madhuri.

Madhuri’s comeback not yet confirm

The buzz in the B-town was that Bollywood actress Madhuri Dixit is back as she will be seen as the former Indian Prime Minister in her upcoming film ‘Mother: The Indira Gandhi Story’, but Dixit herself said she hasn’t made up her mind yet.

“Yes, Shah did meet me with the script. I read it and I am really impressed with the research he has done. I consider Indira Gandhi my idol, so it would be a privilege to play her. But I haven`t agreed yet as I need to sort out a lot of other issues. My secretary, Rikku Rakeshnath, is figuring that out,” says the actress.

Krishna Shah is so keen to cast Dixit as Indira Gandhi, that he took a computer imaging of the actress as Indira Gandhi with him when he went to meet her. Also the reports are that actor Abhay Deol has been approached for the role of Rajiv Gandhi.

Related articles by Zemanta

• India Restricts Media on Visit by Dalai Lama (nytimes.com)